911 Truth no one will admit to. (Advanced Truthers only)

By Edmund Matthews

Not to be taken literally.

Because it wasn't Arabs with box cutters does this mean that the only other culprit is the governments or faction controlling or within?

Could it not be, that it was not the Arabs, nor the governments or the illuminati or any other them, but in fact as hard as it might be to except, it was us. We did it.

We did it, with the power of our minds and our collective consciousness. It was an accident that led to a series of calamities that all came as a result of us not knowing and understanding that our thoughts are very powerful and we must learn to control them.

It will be very difficult for you to accept this, you are constantly telling yourself that this is a 3 dimensional universe where the laws of physics are constant, that maths is real and matters and all the centimeters are all the same length. That words have meaning, and things can be distinguished between, that time is a constant, the past did happen and that you are in the present on the way to the future, that you are one of many conscious humans on a planet, you cannot see all of it or hear all of it, but you believe regardless all of it exists at any given time.

You are wrong!   

The only constant is you.

That which you remember and all its constructs do not exist, that which exists only exists, only because you are aware of it.

Imagine back to the past that never happened before humans or animals or consciousness of any kind evolved. Did it exist, if there was nothing to be conscious of it? If you were conscious, but you had nothing to be conscious of, would you really be conscious? could you really be sure that you existed at all?

Consciousness and that which it is conscious of are two sides of the same coin and are dependent on one another to exist. One effects the other, just as events effect our consciousness, our consciousness has an effect on events.

Humans have convinced themselves that events effect them and that they do not and cannot effect events, many will argue that this has been done to them, but in fact this is something we are doing to ourselves.

We have trapped ourselves in a box and we cling to the walls of this box, quickly papering over and re-plastering any holes in them that may appear, it seems that every bit of consciousness wants us to believe that the box is real and we will rationalize anything to maintain the walls of the box, however this prison has no walls, the box does not exist and this is all a delusion we convince ourselves of.

As much as anyone of us might understand this and let the walls down, the most precious of the walls is the illusion of collective consciousness, we do not want to be alone and will pretend we are not, however much we know we are.

So let's leave that wall in place for now, as me communicating with you becomes pointless without it and ask do we collectively or individually have the ability to change the world with our thoughts.

Dr Judy Wood asks this question "Where did the Towers Go?" and it is a good question.

If you told the Masked Magician or Jonathan Creek that a large object disappeared, their first assumption would be that it was never there in the first place, and thus making it disappear is much easier than it would seem. 

So what happened that day in the false construct that we call the past?

First it is important to realize that the vast majority of us watched the events through the medium of television.

For these people New York and the Twin Towers only manifested on the television screen.

They do not and have never existed except for in your mind, even if you remembering being there in New York that day, it is still only a projection of consciousness.

You will likely remember events a bit like this.

In amongst the random fluctuations, the events that occupy our lives, a plane crashed into one of the Twin Towers. In and of itself "not miraculous" on hearing the news most people tuning into the TV would have thought. But if they are honest and many will deny it, they would have also thought "damn it, I wish I had seen that". Is it possible that millions of people all having that thought, all at the same time could have caused a generic plane to fly in as if from no where and crash into the other building?

If this were computer graphics or TV fakery as suggested by Simon Shack or holographics as suggested by Richard D Hall and John Lear. Then why would they have gone to so much effort, not to bother to make the plane appear as the plane it was supposed to be?

The inconstancy of the plane, the way it morphs and changes, could this not be because the imaginations of millions are being averaged as collectively we agree what the plane should look like? Did the impacts look the way they did because this is how millions of badly educated people who've watched too many movies, would have imagined it to have looked?

At this point two planes had now hit the two Twin Towers, no longer was this unremarkable, now people around the world thought they were living a movie and though they will not admit it, they were all very excited. Many people watching perhaps not as many as before will have thought "o go on fly a plane into something else" and low and behold a plane flies into the Pentagon, but they didn't get to see it this time. What of the other plane? Perhaps those desiring another hit were diluted by those that had now moved from excitement to fear, and the result was another plane crashing, but not hitting its target.

At this point millions of people were looking at the towers, millions of minds focused on those towers, how many people thought "those towers are coming down"? I remember I did, it happened sooner than I thought it would.

If a giant stamped on that building it would have imbedded itself in his foot, a giant could have bent it in half and catapulted a battle ship to The Moon with it and yet the towers disintegrated in front of our eyes, why because they were never there at all, they were just a construct. Not a construct of steel and concrete, but a construct of thought yours and mine.

Our reality is ours to construct and deconstruct at will, we have only forgotten, it's a truth we don't want to know

Perhaps if we had all thought of it, they could have blasted off into space like a pair of rockets. Perhaps if we were all aware of the power of our thoughts we could have prevented any of it happening at all.

Was Building 7 the result of sad people you know who you were, sat there all day watching the television hoping for something else to happen to give yourself one more hit of what you had felt earlier that day. Were you still wanting to see the first plane hit, well that which you desired was given to you, however unlikely that footage was to exist. 

Since that day when all the laws physics were broken a hundred different ways and this reality demonstrated a sham for all to see, we have all tried to rationalize the events to maintain our delusion and keep us all in our box. With at first the mainstream version of events, that makes no sense, followed by the truth movement, with one theory after another attempting rationalize the so called impossible. With hidden secret physics and technology put on display for all to see, incompetence from the clearly competent and laziness from people who can hardly be described as lazy, and contempt for the intelligence of the people, who they go to extraordinary lengths to fool, with conspiracies ever more complex that they could never be planned or agreed to in their detail. We struggle with the facts and the delusion we project twists and shapes itself to rationalize the events and yet more anomalies arise and further we try to explain them away to preserve our box. Where we are not alone and we have someone to blame, where we are not powerful, just the victims of our own imaginations.

You must control your thoughts or they will control you. You must realize the power of your thoughts if you are to use them wisely. You must take responsibility individually or collectively, you cannot defer it to anyone or anything else, for you are all there is. You are our only hope.

 

 

     

911 - The Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Question

By Edmund Matthews

 

The gist of post hoc ergo propter hoc is this, if man walks into a room and flicks a light switch and a light comes on, he is very likely to assume that flicking the light switch caused the light to come on, as one thing happened immediately after the other. However, it is not necessarily true, there may be another man in the room next door who is peering through hole in the wall watching to see when the switch is flicked and then he flicks another switch that causes the light to come on. Not likely but possible.

Furthermore, if a man walks into a room and flicks a light switch and a minute later a light comes on, then he is less likely to assume a causal relationship between flicking the switch and the light coming on. If a man walks into a room and flicks a light switch and an hour later a light comes on he is even less likely to assume a causal relationship between flicking the switch and the light coming on. If a man walks into a room and flicks a light switch and a day later a light comes on, then he is even less likely to assume a causal relationship between flicking the switch and the light coming on. However, it remains possible there could be a timer for example that delays the light coming on a minute, an hour or a day later.

So how does this relate to 911, Well it poses a very interesting question because had they (whoever they may be) wanted to convince the world that the planes hitting the buildings caused the buildings to collapse, then why leave any time between the two events.

It really doesn't matter, whether it's a matter of pressing play on a piece of pre-prepared footage created in computer or whether your pushing down on an Acme plunger tied to tonnes of TNT or thermite or whatever or if you are pressing a big red button on a directed energy weapon, the question remains the same. Why leave any time between the plane or missile or computer graphics or whatever it was that hit the buildings and the buildings collapsing?

Some will immediately say they wanted to sell a story of structural failure (as a result of fire) and this would take some time to happen. However ever this didn't convince many people and those people went on to convince others that something wasn't quite as it might seem. They would have had a very hard time doing so, had the plane hit the building and the building immediately collapsed. It would have been very difficult to convince anyone that one thing did not cause the other because of the assumption of causality that would come from immediate succession of the two event. "I saw the plane hit the building and the building collapsed, I'm pretty sure one thing caused the other" they would say and no amount of reasoned argument would be likely to sway them. The fact that there is a period of time between the plane hitting the building and the building collapsing allows for   reasonable doubt as to whether one thing caused the other.

So why the gap? Whatever theory you go by, and it really doesn't matter whether it's a matter of pressing play on a piece of pre-prepared footage created in computer or whether your pushing down on an Acme plunger tied to tonnes of TNT or thermite or whatever or if you are pressing a big red button on a directed energy weapon, the question remains the same.  Why is there a necessity for a period of time between the planes or missiles or computer graphics hitting the buildings and the buildings collapsing, however long that period of time may have been?

Now, it is not good enough simple to answer the question, why is there a period of time between the plane hitting the building and the building collapsing, you must answer the question why is the period time between the plane hitting the building and the building collapsing as long as it is? However ever long that may have been. It really doesn't matter, whether it's a matter of pressing play on a piece of pre-prepared footage created in computer or whether your pushing down on an Acme plunger tied to tonnes of TNT or thermite or whatever or if you are pressing a big red button on a directed energy weapon, the question remains the same. The plane hits the building, some time passes during this period of time it is a don't push button situation, till at some point it becomes a push the button situation. What is the casual factor in this change. What is the critical factor that allows for the button to be pushed whereas before for, however long it was since the plane hit the building it was not to be pushed. Or to put it another way, however long the period time was between the plane hitting the building and the building collapsing, why not 5 minutes more?, why not five minutes less?, there have must be some reason why the button was pressed when it was.

Now some will say that it is because that was what was prescribed in the script, however the question remains, why not 5 minutes more or 5 minutes less? Now some will say that it is because that is how long they predicted a structural collapse would convincingly take. To which begs the question, would have five minutes more been more or less convincing? More over this still doesn't answer the question as to why there is any period of time between the plane hitting the building and the building collapsing? As structural failure could be instant and delayed structural failure leads to doubt as to the cause.

Any theory of 911 that cannot answer these two question satisfactorily in my view is not a complete theory and more over I believe in coming to a satisfactory answer to these questions we may finally figure out, how it was done.

 Answers on a post card please.

 

 

 

 9.11.01 by Edmund Matthews